Shutterfly Inc. (SFLY)
Loading...
Symbols:
SFLY Forum Topics
- All Comments on SFLY
- General Discussion on SFLY
- How To Survive the Market Sinkhole [view article]
- Internet Stock Roundup: Shutterfly, Monster Worldwide, and Netflix [view article]
- Microsoft’s Shopping List [view article]
- What Should Microsoft Buy Instead? [view article]
- Still Bullish on Shutterfly [view article]
- A Disappointing Shutterfly Is Under Serious Pressure [view article]
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
- Shutterfly Looks Dirt Cheap [view article]
- Why is Shutterfly Shuddering? [view article]
- Why Yahoo Must Acquire Shutterfly [view article]
- Why Is Shutterfly's Jim Clark So Concerned About SarbOx Constraints? [view article]
Recent SFLY Articles
- Top 12 Consumer Internet Stocks
- Internet Stock Roundup: Shutterfly, Monster Worldwide, and Netflix
- Shutterfly: Q2 Earnings Likely to Disappoint
- Microsoft’s Shopping List
- What Should Microsoft Buy Instead?
- Still Bullish on Shutterfly
- A Disappointing Shutterfly Is Under Serious Pressure
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News
- Shutterfly Looks Dirt Cheap
- Shutterfly: Picturing Profits
- Full List of Articles »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
loading ...
Horowitz
How To Survive the Market Sinkhole [view article]
Cyclops:Use both your eyes and see the date of this and then look at my posts after and you will see how as time and info changed, we moved the advice. THINK before you comment...I wrote DOZENS of posts to help you get out of financials....
But, your comment is very helpful...
Andrew Reply
How To Survive the Market Sinkhole [view article]
Good call on LEH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ReplyLeverage
Internet Stock Roundup: Shutterfly, Monster Worldwide, and Netflix [view article]
oops! I was referring to SFLY. ReplyLeverage
Internet Stock Roundup: Shutterfly, Monster Worldwide, and Netflix [view article]
do I drop this potential dog or hold on through year-end??? ReplyInternet Stock Roundup: Shutterfly, Monster Worldwide, and Netflix [view article]
the smart money is short bbi ReplyInternet Stock Roundup: Shutterfly, Monster Worldwide, and Netflix [view article]
singhdvd kiosks hurt bbi more than nflx. As per the quarterly report nflx doesn't see themself in direct competition with pay per view right now which is what amazon is pushing. Pay per views compete with cable right now. Reply
clarify . .
.
Internet Stock Roundup: Shutterfly, Monster Worldwide, and Netflix [view article]
FYI, Trovix, the company Monster acquired, actually uses "semantic" search technology, having nothing to do with the company Symantec. Semantic Search is the "science of meaning in language to produce highly relevant search results" and will provide Monster with an incredibly intuitive search tool that will help connect employers and job seekers better than ever before. ReplyInternet Stock Roundup: Shutterfly, Monster Worldwide, and Netflix [view article]
HireRight has already been merged with USIS Commercial Services Businesswww.hireright.com/news...
And HireRight and Monster have signed an alliance agreement
www.hireright.com/news... Reply
Internet Stock Roundup: Shutterfly, Monster Worldwide, and Netflix [view article]
REDBOX is all over Jewel WALMART and now WAlgreens . i think NFLX goes t 20's when BBI an AMZN announce online viewing Videos without SETUPBOX ReplyMicrosoft’s Shopping List [view article]
Microsoft would be stupid to buy a property website in the US because they all lose copious amounts of money. They should look at markets overseas where big profits are made from connecting realtors to buyers. Rightmove (UK), ImmobilenScout24 (Germany), SeLoger (France) and REA Group (Australia) all make 30-40% profit margins and have - collectively - created billions in new wealth for their owners. Why should Microsoft back companies that only lose money ? Backing winners would seem a more sensible course. ReplyWhat Should Microsoft Buy Instead? [view article]
Agree with previous commentator, Baidu is the MSFT acquisition which stikes fear in the hearts of the Google founders who could never compete due to U.S./China relations and antitrust considerations. And it represents the future, while Yahoo represents the unsuccessful past. ReplyMicrosoft’s Shopping List [view article]
SA editors,Where is Sramana's disclosure regarding the above mentioned stocks? Reply
Still Bullish on Shutterfly [view article]
What is the attraction? What would make the average Joe (me) want to create an account and use this company's service? I don't see the hook to reel me in. Let me know, would ya'? ReplyWhat Should Microsoft Buy Instead? [view article]
Nice job ignoring the 800lb gorilla in the room. Microsoft could buy Baidu for somewhere south of $20b and get a jump on Google in China. After all, its Google is Microsoft's natural competitor and China is the next big prize. I'm surprised you didn't even mention it. ReplyGrillo
What Should Microsoft Buy Instead? [view article]
Extraordinary article! In all the intensity of this Yahoo-Microsoft almost-deal, we might have forgotten to ask the most relevant question in the first place: why does Microsoft need Yahoo? Which is to say, how come Microsoft, with all its might, has been unable to build a relevant, coherent Web presence by itself? In part, this link to an incredible video in YouTube entitled "Microsoft Re-Designs the Ipod Packaging" explains it: www.youtube.com/watch?...Microsoft has grown to be a soul-less corporation that has lost touch with what consumers value today. Yahoo is not far behind -hence its woes-. The difference between these two companies and the portfolio mentioned in your article is that the latter includes true representatives of the Web 2.0 ethos: nimble, personal, creative, emotional. I am afraid Microsoft's corporate culture will simply smother everything it touches. It is good that the deal Yahoo-Microsotf didn't take place: most likely, it would have been another AOL-Time Warner or Sprint-Nextel. Reply