<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Seeking Alpha Internet Content/Community stocks</title>
    <description>'Internet Content/Community' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/tag/internet-content</link>
    <item>
      <title>Facebook Buzz Only Adds to Baidu's Rally</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262966-facebook-buzz-only-adds-to-baidu-s-rally?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">262966</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
  <em>By Tim Seymour</em>
</p> <p>Looks like Facebook may have finalized its choice of a local partner  as it gears up to create a social networking site in China, and Baidu (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bidu' title='Baidu.com, Inc.'>BIDU</a>) is the winner.</p> <p>Sohu (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sohu' title='Sohu.com Inc.'>SOHU</a>)  is reporting that Mark Zuckerberg and Baidu CEO Robin Li have been talking about putting together a social network and have signed an initial agreement to cooperate.</p> <p>BIDU is already the Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) of China in terms of the web search market. If it can become the Facebook of China as well, look out.</p> <p>This may be another lost opportunity for GOOG to compete on the  global stage, The U.S. search giant has been effectively forced out of  China — one of the biggest and fastest-growing web markets — and now</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:31:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Emerging Money</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.emergingmoney.com'>Emerging Money</a> submits:</strong><p>
  <em>By Tim Seymour</em>
</p> <p>Looks like Facebook may have finalized its choice of a local partner  as it gears up to create a social networking site in China, and Baidu (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bidu' title='Baidu.com, Inc.'>BIDU</a>) is the winner.</p> <p>Sohu (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sohu' title='Sohu.com Inc.'>SOHU</a>)  is reporting that Mark Zuckerberg and Baidu CEO Robin Li have been talking about putting together a social network and have signed an initial agreement to cooperate.</p> <p>BIDU is already the Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) of China in terms of the web search market. If it can become the Facebook of China as well, look out.</p> <p>This may be another lost opportunity for GOOG to compete on the  global stage, The U.S. search giant has been effectively forced out of  China — one of the biggest and fastest-growing web markets — and now</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/262966-facebook-buzz-only-adds-to-baidu-s-rally?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bidu">BIDU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/emerging-money">Emerging Money</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Apple, Google, Microsoft or Yahoo Should Buy MySpace</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262165-why-apple-google-microsoft-or-yahoo-should-buy-myspace?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">262165</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>News Corp (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nwsa' title='News Corp.'>NWSA</a>) acquired MySpace.com in July 2005 for $580 million in cash.  After some early successes, highlighted by a three year $900 million advertising deal with Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>), MySpace has fallen out of favor and been eclipsed by Facebook and Twitter.  In early 2011, News Corp eliminated half of MySpace's workforce and studied strategic alternatives for the troubled segment.  <br/><br/>According to comScore Media, as of June 2010, MySpace had 101 million unique global users.  As of February 2011, the number of worldwide users fell to 63 million.  This is a staggering drop, but it is still an undeniably large user base.  In early 2011, Facebook raised funds through Goldman Sachs that valued the social media site at $50 billion. With 500 million users, this values Facebook at roughly $100/user.  Based on this estimate, MySpace's 63 million user accounts could be worth $6.3 billion.  Of course, this is a bad</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:46:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>NakedValue</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://nakedvalue.com/'>NakedValue</a> submits:</strong><p>News Corp (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nwsa' title='News Corp.'>NWSA</a>) acquired MySpace.com in July 2005 for $580 million in cash.  After some early successes, highlighted by a three year $900 million advertising deal with Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>), MySpace has fallen out of favor and been eclipsed by Facebook and Twitter.  In early 2011, News Corp eliminated half of MySpace's workforce and studied strategic alternatives for the troubled segment.  <br/><br/>According to comScore Media, as of June 2010, MySpace had 101 million unique global users.  As of February 2011, the number of worldwide users fell to 63 million.  This is a staggering drop, but it is still an undeniably large user base.  In early 2011, Facebook raised funds through Goldman Sachs that valued the social media site at $50 billion. With 500 million users, this values Facebook at roughly $100/user.  Based on this estimate, MySpace's 63 million user accounts could be worth $6.3 billion.  Of course, this is a bad</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/262165-why-apple-google-microsoft-or-yahoo-should-buy-myspace?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nwsa">NWSA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/albcf.pk">ALBCF.PK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/nakedvalue">NakedValue</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Could Become Serious Competition for Sirius XM</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262064-apple-could-become-serious-competition-for-sirius-xm?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">262064</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Arbitron (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/arb' title='Arbitron, Inc.'>ARB</a>) and <a href="http://www.edisonresearch.com/aboutus/index.php" rel="nofollow">Edison Research</a> released a <a href="http://www.arbitron.com/downloads/infinite_dial_2011_presentation.pdf" rel="nofollow">report</a> on Tuesday that bodes well for the future of internet radio and smartphone access to media, but offers mixed results for Sirius XM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/siri' title='Sirius XM Radio'>SIRI</a>).</p><p>The study used a random sample of 2,020 respondents, 12 years of age and older, culled via random digit dialing and from Arbitron Fall 2010 <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/261567-the-ipad-app-controversy-nielsen-s-role-and-who-becomes-old-guard-media">diary keepers</a>. Telephone interviews, which included both landlines and mobile phones, and diary keepers represented 54 and 46 percent of the sample, respectively. Researchers conducted 480 of the interviews with cell phone respondents, according to the Edison website.</p><p>To almost nobody's surprise, the study found that smartphone ownership tripled over the last two years. That's just the beginning of the bad news for Sirius XM if you buy into <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/260581-the-smart-phone-threat-to-sirius-xm">the notion</a> that internet radio and streaming from a smartphone could hurt the satellite radio provider's position.</p> <ul><li>Weekly use of all types of online</li></ul>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:37:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rocco Pendola</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/author/rocco-pendola'>Rocco Pendola</a> submits:</strong><p>Arbitron (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/arb' title='Arbitron, Inc.'>ARB</a>) and <a href="http://www.edisonresearch.com/aboutus/index.php" rel="nofollow">Edison Research</a> released a <a href="http://www.arbitron.com/downloads/infinite_dial_2011_presentation.pdf" rel="nofollow">report</a> on Tuesday that bodes well for the future of internet radio and smartphone access to media, but offers mixed results for Sirius XM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/siri' title='Sirius XM Radio'>SIRI</a>).</p><p>The study used a random sample of 2,020 respondents, 12 years of age and older, culled via random digit dialing and from Arbitron Fall 2010 <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/261567-the-ipad-app-controversy-nielsen-s-role-and-who-becomes-old-guard-media">diary keepers</a>. Telephone interviews, which included both landlines and mobile phones, and diary keepers represented 54 and 46 percent of the sample, respectively. Researchers conducted 480 of the interviews with cell phone respondents, according to the Edison website.</p><p>To almost nobody's surprise, the study found that smartphone ownership tripled over the last two years. That's just the beginning of the bad news for Sirius XM if you buy into <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/260581-the-smart-phone-threat-to-sirius-xm">the notion</a> that internet radio and streaming from a smartphone could hurt the satellite radio provider's position.</p> <ul><li>Weekly use of all types of online</li></ul><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/262064-apple-could-become-serious-competition-for-sirius-xm?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/siri">SIRI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ccmo.pk">CCMO.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rocco-pendola">Rocco Pendola</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Companies Should Be Concerned About Preserving Quality Journalism</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/261916-why-companies-should-be-concerned-about-preserving-quality-journalism?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">261916</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Knight Foundation has issued a call to all philanthropic  foundations to seriously consider funding efforts to preserver quality  journalism and the development of media skills in the new digital  frontier. The goal is to get a wider range of funders involved in  supporting media and journalism projects, which Knight believes can  increase the number of informed citizens and advocates for change.</p> <p>The foundation has produced<a href="http://www.informationneeds.org/getting-started-tips-for-funders-on-journalism-and-media-grant-making" rel="nofollow"> a guide </a>to help potential funders to understand.</p> <p>But there are other reasons for foundations to support the  development of digital media initiatives.  In the future, every company  has to become more of a media company.  Now that they can be in much  more direct touch with their customers, due to the growth of social  media and digital platforms that allow everyone access to much more  information,  companies are finding that they need to understand how to  communicate with their constituencies.</p> <p>It’s no longer</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:19:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Larry Kramer</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://cscape.wordpress.com/'>Larry Kramer</a> submits: </strong><p>The Knight Foundation has issued a call to all philanthropic  foundations to seriously consider funding efforts to preserver quality  journalism and the development of media skills in the new digital  frontier. The goal is to get a wider range of funders involved in  supporting media and journalism projects, which Knight believes can  increase the number of informed citizens and advocates for change.</p> <p>The foundation has produced<a href="http://www.informationneeds.org/getting-started-tips-for-funders-on-journalism-and-media-grant-making" rel="nofollow"> a guide </a>to help potential funders to understand.</p> <p>But there are other reasons for foundations to support the  development of digital media initiatives.  In the future, every company  has to become more of a media company.  Now that they can be in much  more direct touch with their customers, due to the growth of social  media and digital platforms that allow everyone access to much more  information,  companies are finding that they need to understand how to  communicate with their constituencies.</p> <p>It’s no longer</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/261916-why-companies-should-be-concerned-about-preserving-quality-journalism?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/larry-kramer">Larry Kramer</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shad Rowe Bullish on Belief That Innovation Is Thriving in America</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/261786-shad-rowe-bullish-on-belief-that-innovation-is-thriving-in-america?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">261786</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Excerpt from Raymond James strategist Jeffrey Saut's <a href="http://www.raymondjames.com/inv_strat.htm" rel="nofollow">latest                 essay</a> (published Monday, April 4th):</p><p>...Since the 1980s I have read articles by Shad (Rowe) in <i>Forbes</i>, <i>Fortune</i>, <i>Barron’s</i>,  etc. and always found them insightful. Moreover, I have often used his  sagacious comments in these missives to emphasize those gleanings in an  attempt to help investors profit from them. This morning is no  exception.</p><p>Shad ... opined why he is a steadfast bull on the American  stock market. Said bullishness does not stem from his nature, for a  couple of decades ago he enjoyed great success as a “short seller.”  Nope, Shad’s bullishness is based on the belief that innovation is  thriving in America. He used Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) as an example. To wit:</p>  <blockquote><blockquote class="quote"><p>“In the United States, two graduate students have managed to develop a  product that led to the creation of the most scalable business model in  history. Google is 12</p></blockquote></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 03:31:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey Saut</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.raymondjames.com/inv_strat.htm'>Jeffrey Saut</a> submits: </strong><p>Excerpt from Raymond James strategist Jeffrey Saut's <a href="http://www.raymondjames.com/inv_strat.htm" rel="nofollow">latest                 essay</a> (published Monday, April 4th):</p><p>...Since the 1980s I have read articles by Shad (Rowe) in <i>Forbes</i>, <i>Fortune</i>, <i>Barron’s</i>,  etc. and always found them insightful. Moreover, I have often used his  sagacious comments in these missives to emphasize those gleanings in an  attempt to help investors profit from them. This morning is no  exception.</p><p>Shad ... opined why he is a steadfast bull on the American  stock market. Said bullishness does not stem from his nature, for a  couple of decades ago he enjoyed great success as a “short seller.”  Nope, Shad’s bullishness is based on the belief that innovation is  thriving in America. He used Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) as an example. To wit:</p>  <blockquote><blockquote class="quote"><p>“In the United States, two graduate students have managed to develop a  product that led to the creation of the most scalable business model in  history. Google is 12</p></blockquote></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/261786-shad-rowe-bullish-on-belief-that-innovation-is-thriving-in-america?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bin">BIN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cbd">CBD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibkc">IBKC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ksu">KSU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/jeffrey-saut">Jeffrey Saut</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chinese Government Going After Google?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/261620-chinese-government-going-after-google?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">261620</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>When Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) threw down the gauntlet and <a href="http://chovanec.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/google-threatens-to-pull-out-of-china/" rel="nofollow">threatened to quit China </a>early  last year, a lot of people figured the Chinese government would come  down on the company like a ton of bricks.  Surprisingly, that didn’t  happen — at least not for a while.  Google redirected its Chinese portal  to Hong Kong, evading Chinese censors, and despite the occasional  hiccup, and a lot of speculation that it might be blocked, its popular  Gmail service remained accessible.</p> <p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/4/4/saupload_google_target.png"/>But  as the old Afghan (no, not Klingon) proverb has it, “Revenge is a dish  best served cold.”  Over the past few weeks, a series of news reports  have emerged that suggest the Chinese government has embarked on a  concerted effort to target and punish Google for its transgressions.   Consider:</p> <ul>
  <li>On March 4, an article on the website of China’s state-published <em>People’s Daily </em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/22/world/asia/22china.html?_r=2" rel="nofollow">accused Google </a>of  being “a tool of the United States</li></ul>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 08:45:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Patrick Chovanec</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://chovanec.wordpress.com/'>Patrick Chovanec</a> submits:</strong><p>When Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) threw down the gauntlet and <a href="http://chovanec.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/google-threatens-to-pull-out-of-china/" rel="nofollow">threatened to quit China </a>early  last year, a lot of people figured the Chinese government would come  down on the company like a ton of bricks.  Surprisingly, that didn’t  happen — at least not for a while.  Google redirected its Chinese portal  to Hong Kong, evading Chinese censors, and despite the occasional  hiccup, and a lot of speculation that it might be blocked, its popular  Gmail service remained accessible.</p> <p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/4/4/saupload_google_target.png"/>But  as the old Afghan (no, not Klingon) proverb has it, “Revenge is a dish  best served cold.”  Over the past few weeks, a series of news reports  have emerged that suggest the Chinese government has embarked on a  concerted effort to target and punish Google for its transgressions.   Consider:</p> <ul>
  <li>On March 4, an article on the website of China’s state-published <em>People’s Daily </em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/22/world/asia/22china.html?_r=2" rel="nofollow">accused Google </a>of  being “a tool of the United States</li></ul><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/261620-chinese-government-going-after-google?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/patrick-chovanec">Patrick Chovanec</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GM, Citi, Yahoo, Google: Using Friday's Options Activity to Get Ready for Monday's Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/261491-gm-citi-yahoo-google-using-friday-s-options-activity-to-get-ready-for-monday-s-market?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">261491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>In addition to my own scans and watch lists, I use two main sources to follow options-related news: Daily Seeking Alpha columns by <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/author/frederic-ruffy"><font>Frederic Ruffy</font></a> and <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/author/andrew-wilkinson"><font>Andrew Wilkinson</font>.</a> <span>While I get great use out of these sources and have even made money thanks to them, you have to be careful not to chase the stocks or options they mention. Often, by the time you receive an alert or summary, contracts have already had too much volatility and upside priced into the premium. Nevertheless, occasionally, you can find examples to capitalize on. Below I detail options brought to my attention by these sources and how investors might consider playing them - or the underlying security - if at all, during the trading week.<br/><br/><strong>General Motors (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm' title='General Motors Corporation'>GM</a>). </strong>In his <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/261398-friday-options-brief-wynn-avl-lltc-gm">options brief</a> early Friday, Wilkinson highlighted GM. Despite reporting lower-than-expected sales for March, traders and investors still bid up GM shares. This triggered</span></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 04:28:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rocco Pendola</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/author/rocco-pendola'>Rocco Pendola</a> submits:</strong><p>In addition to my own scans and watch lists, I use two main sources to follow options-related news: Daily Seeking Alpha columns by <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/author/frederic-ruffy"><font>Frederic Ruffy</font></a> and <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/author/andrew-wilkinson"><font>Andrew Wilkinson</font>.</a> <span>While I get great use out of these sources and have even made money thanks to them, you have to be careful not to chase the stocks or options they mention. Often, by the time you receive an alert or summary, contracts have already had too much volatility and upside priced into the premium. Nevertheless, occasionally, you can find examples to capitalize on. Below I detail options brought to my attention by these sources and how investors might consider playing them - or the underlying security - if at all, during the trading week.<br/><br/><strong>General Motors (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm' title='General Motors Corporation'>GM</a>). </strong>In his <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/261398-friday-options-brief-wynn-avl-lltc-gm">options brief</a> early Friday, Wilkinson highlighted GM. Despite reporting lower-than-expected sales for March, traders and investors still bid up GM shares. This triggered</span></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/261491-gm-citi-yahoo-google-using-friday-s-options-activity-to-get-ready-for-monday-s-market?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm">GM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/f">F</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tm">TM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hmc">HMC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nsany.pk">NSANY.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tsla">TSLA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c">C</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rocco-pendola">Rocco Pendola</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amazon Assaults the Competition in the Air, On the Ground, And From the Cloud</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/260841-amazon-assaults-the-competition-in-the-air-on-the-ground-and-from-the-cloud?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">260841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>I must proudly and openly state the following: If anybody can mute my love of Steve Jobs, it's Jeff Bezos. The Amazon.com (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='Amazon.com Inc.'>AMZN</a>) CEO clearly considers taking on competitors in just one sector child's play. <br/><br/>In this article, I will review the areas where Bezos and Amazon have taken the offensive. Instead of simply reacting to trends, Amazon either sets them or executes land grabs so strong it effectively replaces the previous trendsetter. <br/><br/><strong>Content Delivery and the Cloud<br/></strong><br/>Amazon's latest salvo against its competition comes as it gets one step up on Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) and Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) in the race to the cloud. Because it's been <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/260679-amazon-beats-apple-and-google-to-cloud-based-music">well-publicized</a>, I will just note in summary that Amazon's <em>Cloud Drive</em> gives users the ability to store music and other digital files on the company's servers. Amazon gives you 5GB free and charges what I view as a nominal cost for space over 5GB.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:45:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rocco Pendola</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/author/rocco-pendola'>Rocco Pendola</a> submits:</strong><p>I must proudly and openly state the following: If anybody can mute my love of Steve Jobs, it's Jeff Bezos. The Amazon.com (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='Amazon.com Inc.'>AMZN</a>) CEO clearly considers taking on competitors in just one sector child's play. <br/><br/>In this article, I will review the areas where Bezos and Amazon have taken the offensive. Instead of simply reacting to trends, Amazon either sets them or executes land grabs so strong it effectively replaces the previous trendsetter. <br/><br/><strong>Content Delivery and the Cloud<br/></strong><br/>Amazon's latest salvo against its competition comes as it gets one step up on Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) and Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) in the race to the cloud. Because it's been <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/260679-amazon-beats-apple-and-google-to-cloud-based-music">well-publicized</a>, I will just note in summary that Amazon's <em>Cloud Drive</em> gives users the ability to store music and other digital files on the company's servers. Amazon gives you 5GB free and charges what I view as a nominal cost for space over 5GB.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/260841-amazon-assaults-the-competition-in-the-air-on-the-ground-and-from-the-cloud?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nflx">NFLX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cstr">CSTR</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rocco-pendola">Rocco Pendola</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bearish on Internet Music Locker Services</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/260830-bearish-on-internet-music-locker-services?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">260830</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't get the idea of music locker services like the one <a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1543596&amp;highlight=" rel="nofollow">Amazon (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='Amazon.com Inc.'>AMZN</a>) just announced</a>. If I'm going to stream music from the cloud, why should I continue to buy files and collect them? I've been a <a href="http://www.rhapsody.com/welcome.html" rel="nofollow">Rhapsody</a>  subscriber for something like 11 or 12 years and although it has taken a  while</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 04:08:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Fred Wilson</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/">Fred Wilson</a> submits: </strong>
<p>I don't get the idea of music locker services like the one <a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1543596&amp;highlight=" rel="nofollow">Amazon (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='Amazon.com Inc.'>AMZN</a>) just announced</a>. If I'm going to stream music from the cloud, why should I continue to buy files and collect them? I've been a <a href="http://www.rhapsody.com/welcome.html" rel="nofollow">Rhapsody</a>  subscriber for something like 11 or 12 years and although it has taken a  while</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/260830-bearish-on-internet-music-locker-services?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/fred-wilson">Fred Wilson</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sina: Time to Take Profits After Recent Run-up</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/260658-sina-time-to-take-profits-after-recent-run-up?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">260658</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Shares of <strong>Sina Corporation (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sina' title='Sina Corp.'>SINA</a>)</strong> have risen 16.6% since I published <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/257241-in-china-sina-entering-an-all-out-microblogging-battle-against-tencent">a positive article on its Twitter-like service Sina Weibo</a>. Based on my latest analysis, Sina shares have risen too fast in the past several weeks. I remain positive on the long-term future of Sina, especially Sina Weibo, but I believe existing shareholders should now take profits at the current price level. My analysis is as follows:</p> <div><strong>Analysis of current market sentiment on SINA.</strong> Since Sina reported Q4 earnings on March 1, Wall Street analysts' consensus EPS estimates for its 2011 and 2012 fiscal years have dropped 14% and 8% respectively, according to data from Yahoo Finance. Despite these earnings downgrades, analysts' average price target on SINA has risen 17.8% to $90.5 since the Q4 earnings release, and shares of Sina have surged 26.2% since March 1. In my view, these seemingly conflicting data points have revealed the market's mainstream</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:35:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Xiaofan Zhang</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/author/xiaofan-zhang/articles'>Xiaofan Zhang</a> submits: </strong><p>Shares of <strong>Sina Corporation (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sina' title='Sina Corp.'>SINA</a>)</strong> have risen 16.6% since I published <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/257241-in-china-sina-entering-an-all-out-microblogging-battle-against-tencent">a positive article on its Twitter-like service Sina Weibo</a>. Based on my latest analysis, Sina shares have risen too fast in the past several weeks. I remain positive on the long-term future of Sina, especially Sina Weibo, but I believe existing shareholders should now take profits at the current price level. My analysis is as follows:</p> <div><strong>Analysis of current market sentiment on SINA.</strong> Since Sina reported Q4 earnings on March 1, Wall Street analysts' consensus EPS estimates for its 2011 and 2012 fiscal years have dropped 14% and 8% respectively, according to data from Yahoo Finance. Despite these earnings downgrades, analysts' average price target on SINA has risen 17.8% to $90.5 since the Q4 earnings release, and shares of Sina have surged 26.2% since March 1. In my view, these seemingly conflicting data points have revealed the market's mainstream</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/260658-sina-time-to-take-profits-after-recent-run-up?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sina">SINA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tcehy.pk">TCEHY.PK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/xiaofan-zhang">Xiaofan Zhang</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Data Center Related Stocks: Earnings Performance Remains Mixed </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/260211-data-center-related-stocks-earnings-performance-remains-mixed?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">260211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>InterXion (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/inxn' title='Interxion Holdings N.V.'>INXN</a>) was the last company in the data center related arena to <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/news-article/804727-interxion-reports-q4-2010-and-fy-2010-results?source=symbol_press">report</a> earnings last Wednesday.</p> <p>The company achieved its 17th consecutive quarter of sequential growth in revenue and Adjusted EBITDA, but the market reacted negatively to a decreased Q/Q increase, compared to the last few quarters, and a weaker than expected guidance, that still forecasts a 15% to 17% growth in revenues for 2011 (InterXion grew about 21.4% in 2010).</p> <p>Analysts were slightly more positive, and mostly reiterated their <span>"Buy<span>" recommendation on the stock. Here is what Piper Jaffray said, as <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/news-article/812238-inxn-an-attractive-buying-opportunity-piper-jaffray-reports">reported</a> by Benzinga:</span></span></p> <blockquote><blockquote class="quote"><p>The company reported in-line to slightly better financials than expected, and management issued solid 2011 guidance, Piper Jaffray writes. The stock was weak Wednesday, providing an attractive buying opportunity for investors.</p></blockquote> </blockquote> <p>Similar comments were made by Oppenheimer, that <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/news-article/812376-oppenheimer-reiterates-inxn-outperform-rating">reiterated</a> its "Outperform" rating:</p> <blockquote><blockquote class="quote"><p>INXN reported its first quarter as a public company. Financial results for</p></blockquote></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:30:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Paolo Gorgo</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://nortiaresearch.blogspot.com/'>Paolo Gorgo</a> submits: </strong><p>InterXion (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/inxn' title='Interxion Holdings N.V.'>INXN</a>) was the last company in the data center related arena to <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/news-article/804727-interxion-reports-q4-2010-and-fy-2010-results?source=symbol_press">report</a> earnings last Wednesday.</p> <p>The company achieved its 17th consecutive quarter of sequential growth in revenue and Adjusted EBITDA, but the market reacted negatively to a decreased Q/Q increase, compared to the last few quarters, and a weaker than expected guidance, that still forecasts a 15% to 17% growth in revenues for 2011 (InterXion grew about 21.4% in 2010).</p> <p>Analysts were slightly more positive, and mostly reiterated their <span>"Buy<span>" recommendation on the stock. Here is what Piper Jaffray said, as <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/news-article/812238-inxn-an-attractive-buying-opportunity-piper-jaffray-reports">reported</a> by Benzinga:</span></span></p> <blockquote><blockquote class="quote"><p>The company reported in-line to slightly better financials than expected, and management issued solid 2011 guidance, Piper Jaffray writes. The stock was weak Wednesday, providing an attractive buying opportunity for investors.</p></blockquote> </blockquote> <p>Similar comments were made by Oppenheimer, that <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/news-article/812376-oppenheimer-reiterates-inxn-outperform-rating">reiterated</a> its "Outperform" rating:</p> <blockquote><blockquote class="quote"><p>INXN reported its first quarter as a public company. Financial results for</p></blockquote></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/260211-data-center-related-stocks-earnings-performance-remains-mixed?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/inxn">INXN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eqix">EQIX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tleiy.pk">TLEIY.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dlr">DLR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dft">DFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cor">COR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/inap">INAP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rax">RAX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/svvs">SVVS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam">AKAM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/llnw">LLNW</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/paolo-gorgo">Paolo Gorgo</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 3 Most Important Product Segments for Akamai</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/260053-the-3-most-important-product-segments-for-akamai?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">260053</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Akamai (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam' title='Akamai Technologies Inc.'>AKAM</a>) competes with other content delivry players like InterNAP Network Services (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/inap' title='InterNAP Network Services Corp.'>INAP</a>), Limelight Networks (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/llnw' title='Limelight Networks, Inc.'>LLNW</a>) and Level 3 (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lvlt' title='Level 3 Communications Inc.'>LVLT</a>). Our price estimate for Akamai stands at $37.11, in line with market price.</p>  <p>
  <strong>The 3 Most Important Product Segments for Akamai</strong>
</p>   <p>
  <strong>
    <span/>
  </strong>
</p> <p>
  <em>1) Media Content Delivery – represents 34% of the company’s value</em>
</p>  <p>Akamai offers content delivery services to accelerate and improve the delivery of media content over the internet. Akamai delivers media content like videos on YouTube and song downloads on iTunes in addition to online movie trailers and delivery of social network sites like MySpace.</p> <p>
  <a href="https://www.trefis.com/company#/AKAM/n-0158?from=sankey" rel="nofollow">See the top forecasts for this division</a>
</p> <p>
  <em>2) Online Shopping Content Delivery – 31%</em>
</p> <p>Akamai offers content delivery<strong> </strong>services  to accelerate and improve the</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:40:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trefis</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.trefis.com/splash?to=/'>Trefis</a> submits: </strong>
<p>Akamai (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam' title='Akamai Technologies Inc.'>AKAM</a>) competes with other content delivry players like InterNAP Network Services (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/inap' title='InterNAP Network Services Corp.'>INAP</a>), Limelight Networks (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/llnw' title='Limelight Networks, Inc.'>LLNW</a>) and Level 3 (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lvlt' title='Level 3 Communications Inc.'>LVLT</a>). Our price estimate for Akamai stands at $37.11, in line with market price.</p>  <p>
  <strong>The 3 Most Important Product Segments for Akamai</strong>
</p>   <p>
  <strong>
    <span/>
  </strong>
</p> <p>
  <em>1) Media Content Delivery – represents 34% of the company’s value</em>
</p>  <p>Akamai offers content delivery services to accelerate and improve the delivery of media content over the internet. Akamai delivers media content like videos on YouTube and song downloads on iTunes in addition to online movie trailers and delivery of social network sites like MySpace.</p> <p>
  <a href="https://www.trefis.com/company#/AKAM/n-0158?from=sankey" rel="nofollow">See the top forecasts for this division</a>
</p> <p>
  <em>2) Online Shopping Content Delivery – 31%</em>
</p> <p>Akamai offers content delivery<strong> </strong>services  to accelerate and improve the</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/260053-the-3-most-important-product-segments-for-akamai?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam">AKAM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trefis">Trefis</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bright Outlook for Akamai</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/259566-bright-outlook-for-akamai?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">259566</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Akamai’s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam' title='Akamai Technologies Inc.'>AKAM</a>) most important division is its media content delivery, constituting around 34% of its stock value by our estimates. The high value attributed to this division in our analysis comes from expectations of rapid growth in Akamai’s revenue per media customer. As a content delivery company providing web content to its customers, Akamai competes with other players like InterNAP Network Services (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/inap' title='InterNAP Network Services Corp.'>INAP</a>), Limelight Networks (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/llnw' title='Limelight Networks, Inc.'>LLNW</a>) and Level 3 (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lvlt' title='Level 3 Communications Inc.'>LVLT</a>).</p>  <p>
  <span/>
</p> <p>Our price estimate for Akamai stands at $37.11, which is roughly in line with market price.</p> <p>
  <strong>Revenue per Media Customer</strong>
</p> <p>We estimate that <a href="https://www.trefis.com/company?hm=AKAM.trefis&amp;driver=0170" rel="nofollow">revenue per media customer</a> for Akamai dropped between 2008 and 2009 (from about $420,000 to 399,000) before recovering to $445,000 in 2010 as the economy stabilized and the internet media space marched forward. We expect this rapid growth to continue and estimate that Akamai’s revenue per media customer could hit $850,000 by the end of our forecast</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:45:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trefis</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.trefis.com/splash?to=/'>Trefis</a> submits: </strong>
<p>Akamai’s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam' title='Akamai Technologies Inc.'>AKAM</a>) most important division is its media content delivery, constituting around 34% of its stock value by our estimates. The high value attributed to this division in our analysis comes from expectations of rapid growth in Akamai’s revenue per media customer. As a content delivery company providing web content to its customers, Akamai competes with other players like InterNAP Network Services (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/inap' title='InterNAP Network Services Corp.'>INAP</a>), Limelight Networks (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/llnw' title='Limelight Networks, Inc.'>LLNW</a>) and Level 3 (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lvlt' title='Level 3 Communications Inc.'>LVLT</a>).</p>  <p>
  <span/>
</p> <p>Our price estimate for Akamai stands at $37.11, which is roughly in line with market price.</p> <p>
  <strong>Revenue per Media Customer</strong>
</p> <p>We estimate that <a href="https://www.trefis.com/company?hm=AKAM.trefis&amp;driver=0170" rel="nofollow">revenue per media customer</a> for Akamai dropped between 2008 and 2009 (from about $420,000 to 399,000) before recovering to $445,000 in 2010 as the economy stabilized and the internet media space marched forward. We expect this rapid growth to continue and estimate that Akamai’s revenue per media customer could hit $850,000 by the end of our forecast</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/259566-bright-outlook-for-akamai?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/akam">AKAM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trefis">Trefis</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NY Times Paywall Limit to Extend Beyond Google to 'All Major Search Engines'</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/259471-ny-times-paywall-limit-to-extend-beyond-google-to-all-major-search-engines?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">259471</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
  <em>By Alexia Tsotsis</em>
</p><p><span><span><span><span>photo © 2006 <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/38315261@N00" rel="nofollow">Sharon Mollerus</a> | <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/38315261@N00/168237138" rel="nofollow">more info </a></span><span><strong>(via: <a href="http://wylio.com/" rel="nofollow">Wylio</a>)</strong></span></span></span></span>When the details of the New York Times (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt' title='New York Times Co.'>NYT</a>) paywall/fence were <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/17/all-you-need-to-know-about-the-nytimes-com-paywall/" rel="nofollow">announced</a> on Thursday, <em>Times</em> PR representatives <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20110317/apple-gets-its-first-big-publisher-new-york-times-paywall-will-be-sold-through-itunes/" rel="nofollow">told press</a> that it would be placing a five article a day limit on Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) referrals, and <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20110318/qa-new-york-times-digital-czar-martin-nisenholtz-on-the-paywall-pricing-google-and-apple/" rel="nofollow">only Google referrals.</a></p> <p>This policy has somehow changed over the weekend, as the <em>Times’</em>  Communications Manager Kristin Mason tells me that the five article  limit will now extend to “all major search engines.” Apparently the  Google-only clause was only specific to the Canadian roll out and</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:34:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>TechCrunch</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/'>TechCrunch</a> submits: </strong>
<p>
  <em>By Alexia Tsotsis</em>
</p><p><span><span><span><span>photo © 2006 <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/38315261@N00" rel="nofollow">Sharon Mollerus</a> | <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/38315261@N00/168237138" rel="nofollow">more info </a></span><span><strong>(via: <a href="http://wylio.com/" rel="nofollow">Wylio</a>)</strong></span></span></span></span>When the details of the New York Times (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt' title='New York Times Co.'>NYT</a>) paywall/fence were <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/17/all-you-need-to-know-about-the-nytimes-com-paywall/" rel="nofollow">announced</a> on Thursday, <em>Times</em> PR representatives <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20110317/apple-gets-its-first-big-publisher-new-york-times-paywall-will-be-sold-through-itunes/" rel="nofollow">told press</a> that it would be placing a five article a day limit on Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) referrals, and <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20110318/qa-new-york-times-digital-czar-martin-nisenholtz-on-the-paywall-pricing-google-and-apple/" rel="nofollow">only Google referrals.</a></p> <p>This policy has somehow changed over the weekend, as the <em>Times’</em>  Communications Manager Kristin Mason tells me that the five article  limit will now extend to “all major search engines.” Apparently the  Google-only clause was only specific to the Canadian roll out and</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/259471-ny-times-paywall-limit-to-extend-beyond-google-to-all-major-search-engines?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt">NYT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/techcrunch">TechCrunch</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Facebook's Secondary Share Value of $34 Gives Company $85 Billion Value</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/259384-facebook-s-secondary-share-value-of-34-gives-company-85-billion-value?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">259384</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
  <em>By MG Siegler</em>
</p><p>Just 10 days ago, <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/11/new-facebook-valuation-record-at-shares-surge-5-to-31-50/" rel="nofollow">we noted</a>  that Facebook had hit a new valuation record as shares on the secondary  markets surged some 5 percent to $31.50 a share. That auction was  through <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/secondmarket" rel="nofollow">SecondMarket</a>  and put the on-paper valuation of the company at roughly $78.75 billion  (based on roughly 2.5 billion shares outstanding). Today — again, just  10 days later — we have another Facebook share auction that has closed.  And unbelievably, the price now is at $34 a share. That’s an even $85  billion valuation.</p> <p>I repeat: $85 billion.</p> <p>It was only three weeks ago that Facebook <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/04/facebook-valuation-secondmarket/" rel="nofollow">hit a massive $75 billion valuation</a>. Again, that was through SecondMarket. Today’s new record numbers come by way of <a href="http://www.sharespost.com/" rel="nofollow">SharesPost</a>.  In a message to clients, they note that they’ve just completed the  auction of 100,000 shares of Class B Common Stock at the $34 price.  Those members are now being</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:44:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>TechCrunch</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/'>TechCrunch</a> submits: </strong>
<p>
  <em>By MG Siegler</em>
</p><p>Just 10 days ago, <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/11/new-facebook-valuation-record-at-shares-surge-5-to-31-50/" rel="nofollow">we noted</a>  that Facebook had hit a new valuation record as shares on the secondary  markets surged some 5 percent to $31.50 a share. That auction was  through <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/secondmarket" rel="nofollow">SecondMarket</a>  and put the on-paper valuation of the company at roughly $78.75 billion  (based on roughly 2.5 billion shares outstanding). Today — again, just  10 days later — we have another Facebook share auction that has closed.  And unbelievably, the price now is at $34 a share. That’s an even $85  billion valuation.</p> <p>I repeat: $85 billion.</p> <p>It was only three weeks ago that Facebook <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/04/facebook-valuation-secondmarket/" rel="nofollow">hit a massive $75 billion valuation</a>. Again, that was through SecondMarket. Today’s new record numbers come by way of <a href="http://www.sharespost.com/" rel="nofollow">SharesPost</a>.  In a message to clients, they note that they’ve just completed the  auction of 100,000 shares of Class B Common Stock at the $34 price.  Those members are now being</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/259384-facebook-s-secondary-share-value-of-34-gives-company-85-billion-value?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/techcrunch">TechCrunch</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All Blog Links to The NY Times Will Be Freebies: This Could Get Ugly</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/259370-all-blog-links-to-the-ny-times-will-be-freebies-this-could-get-ugly?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">259370</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
  <em>By Alexia Tsotsis</em>
</p><p>
  <a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/3/21/saupload_screen_shot_2011_03_21_at_12_08_22_pm.png" rel="lightbox"/>
</p> <p>It’s not news that the <em>New York Times </em>(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt' title='New York Times Co.'>NYT</a>) payfence isn’t much of a fence. We’ve already written about the <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/17/the-social-loophole/" rel="nofollow">Facebook and Twitter loophole</a>, but it turns out that the loophole is more like a loop chasm.</p> <p><em>NYT</em> head Martin Nisenholtz <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20110318/qa-new-york-times-digital-czar-martin-nisenholtz-on-the</p rel="nofollow">]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:49:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>TechCrunch</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/'>TechCrunch</a> submits: </strong>
<p>
  <em>By Alexia Tsotsis</em>
</p><p>
  <a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/3/21/saupload_screen_shot_2011_03_21_at_12_08_22_pm.png" rel="lightbox"/>
</p> <p>It’s not news that the <em>New York Times </em>(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt' title='New York Times Co.'>NYT</a>) payfence isn’t much of a fence. We’ve already written about the <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/17/the-social-loophole/" rel="nofollow">Facebook and Twitter loophole</a>, but it turns out that the loophole is more like a loop chasm.</p> <p><em>NYT</em> head Martin Nisenholtz <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20110318/qa-new-york-times-digital-czar-martin-nisenholtz-on-the</p rel="nofollow"><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/259370-all-blog-links-to-the-ny-times-will-be-freebies-this-could-get-ugly?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt">NYT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/techcrunch">TechCrunch</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google's YouTube Revenues Will Pass $1 Billion in 2012</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/259328-google-s-youtube-revenues-will-pass-1-billion-in-2012?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">259328</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/3/21/saupload_youtube_rev_est.jpg" rel="lightbox"/>With nearly $30 billion in annual revenues last year, Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) needs to keep both dominating search <em>and</em>  find new billion-dollar businesses fast.  Google’s biggest  opportunities beyond search are display advertising, video advertising  (YouTube), mobile search, and local.  And if it ever gets its act  together on social, that could be a wild card.  Last October, the  company <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2010/10/14/google-revenue-numbers/" rel="nofollow">pointed out</a>  that its display advertising business (including YouTube) and mobile  search was already bringing in an additional $3.5 billion in annualized  gross revenues.</p>  <p>Citi analyst <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/person/mark-mahaney" rel="nofollow">Mark Mahaney</a>  breaks down some of Google’s opportunities for new billion-dollar  businesses in a new research report he released this morning.  In  particular, he focuses on two of Google’s most promising growth  opportunities: YouTube and local advertising.  According to his  estimates, YouTube’s gross revenues hit $825 million in 2010, and will  reach $1.3 billion in 2011 and $1.7 billion in 2012.  After stripping  out revenue share,</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:54:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Erick Schonfeld</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/">Erick Schonfeld</a> submits: </strong><p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/3/21/saupload_youtube_rev_est.jpg" rel="lightbox"/>With nearly $30 billion in annual revenues last year, Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) needs to keep both dominating search <em>and</em>  find new billion-dollar businesses fast.  Google’s biggest  opportunities beyond search are display advertising, video advertising  (YouTube), mobile search, and local.  And if it ever gets its act  together on social, that could be a wild card.  Last October, the  company <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2010/10/14/google-revenue-numbers/" rel="nofollow">pointed out</a>  that its display advertising business (including YouTube) and mobile  search was already bringing in an additional $3.5 billion in annualized  gross revenues.</p>  <p>Citi analyst <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/person/mark-mahaney" rel="nofollow">Mark Mahaney</a>  breaks down some of Google’s opportunities for new billion-dollar  businesses in a new research report he released this morning.  In  particular, he focuses on two of Google’s most promising growth  opportunities: YouTube and local advertising.  According to his  estimates, YouTube’s gross revenues hit $825 million in 2010, and will  reach $1.3 billion in 2011 and $1.7 billion in 2012.  After stripping  out revenue share,</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/259328-google-s-youtube-revenues-will-pass-1-billion-in-2012?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/erick-schonfeld">Erick Schonfeld</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Salesforce.com Management Upbeat About Chatter's Prospects</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/258944-salesforce-com-management-upbeat-about-chatter-s-prospects?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">258944</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Salesforce.com  (NYSE:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/crm' title='Salesforce.com'>CRM</a>) recently announced its FY Q4 2011 earnings in which it  mentioned that its Chatter application is gaining traction making the  company the largest provider of enterprise social networks in the world.<sup> [<a href="http://www.trefis.com/articles/44895/salesforce-com-management-upbeat-about-chatter-and-its-prospects/2011-03-17#footnote_0_44895" rel="nofollow">1</a>]</sup>  Chatter is an application that provides social networking and real-time  connection features for enterprises. We believe Salesforce.com could  use Chatter to expand its enterprise customer base and up-sell its more  valuable cloud-based products like its customer relationship management  (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/crm' title='Salesforce.com'>CRM</a>) software and Force.com. Salesforce.com competes with SAP (NYSE:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap' title='SAP AG'>SAP</a>), Oracle (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='Oracle Corp.'>ORCL</a>), Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='Microsoft Corp.'>MSFT</a>) and IBM (NYSE:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='International Business Machines Corp.'>IBM</a>) in the CRM software market.</p> <p>
  <span>Below we will take a look at some of the  comments made by the management on Chatter during the earnings  conference call. We maintain a <a href="http://www.trefis.com/company?hm=CRM.trefis&amp;hk=9a880557b2a544325352201b85a3776bc6b4a9ab" rel="nofollow">$116 price estimate for Salesforce.com stock</a>, which is about 6% lower than market price.</span>
</p> <p>
  <strong>Management bullish about Chatter and its prospects</strong>
</p> <p>According to management, the Chatter application has gained faster  adoption with</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:24:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trefis</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.trefis.com/splash?to=/'>Trefis</a> submits: </strong>
<p>Salesforce.com  (NYSE:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/crm' title='Salesforce.com'>CRM</a>) recently announced its FY Q4 2011 earnings in which it  mentioned that its Chatter application is gaining traction making the  company the largest provider of enterprise social networks in the world.<sup> [<a href="http://www.trefis.com/articles/44895/salesforce-com-management-upbeat-about-chatter-and-its-prospects/2011-03-17#footnote_0_44895" rel="nofollow">1</a>]</sup>  Chatter is an application that provides social networking and real-time  connection features for enterprises. We believe Salesforce.com could  use Chatter to expand its enterprise customer base and up-sell its more  valuable cloud-based products like its customer relationship management  (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/crm' title='Salesforce.com'>CRM</a>) software and Force.com. Salesforce.com competes with SAP (NYSE:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap' title='SAP AG'>SAP</a>), Oracle (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='Oracle Corp.'>ORCL</a>), Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='Microsoft Corp.'>MSFT</a>) and IBM (NYSE:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='International Business Machines Corp.'>IBM</a>) in the CRM software market.</p> <p>
  <span>Below we will take a look at some of the  comments made by the management on Chatter during the earnings  conference call. We maintain a <a href="http://www.trefis.com/company?hm=CRM.trefis&amp;hk=9a880557b2a544325352201b85a3776bc6b4a9ab" rel="nofollow">$116 price estimate for Salesforce.com stock</a>, which is about 6% lower than market price.</span>
</p> <p>
  <strong>Management bullish about Chatter and its prospects</strong>
</p> <p>According to management, the Chatter application has gained faster  adoption with</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/258944-salesforce-com-management-upbeat-about-chatter-s-prospects?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/crm">CRM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trefis">Trefis</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New York Times Launches Digital Subscriptions: Pros and Cons</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/258865-new-york-times-launches-digital-subscriptions-pros-and-cons?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">258865</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>The New York Times (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt' title='New York Times Co.'>NYT</a>) on Thursday launched its long-awaited  digital subscription plan and access for all platforms—smartphones,  tablets and Web—can be pricey at $35 a month, but the model may just  work out.</p> <p>This digital subscription plan aims to thread a lot of needles. For  starters, the Times doesn’t want to nuke its Web traffic. As a result,  everyone gets 20 pieces of content before a subscription is needed.</p> <p>Once you hit that cap things can get complicated in a hurry (<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110317005924/en/York-Times-Launches-Digital-Subscriptions" rel="nofollow">statement</a>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/18/opinion/l18times.html" rel="nofollow">Times’ letter to readers</a>):</p> <ul><li>For Web access and the smartphone app it’s $15 a month, or $180 a year.</li><li>For Web access and a tablet app, it’s $20 a month, or $240 a year.</li><li>For access to all digital content—tablet, smartphone and Web—it’s $35 a month, or $420 a year.</li><li>And the Times is supporting in-app purchase on Apple’s App Store.</li></ul><p>As I noted in my <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004I6D07C" rel="nofollow">Kindle</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:13:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Larry Dignan</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/dignanwtbkd.gif' title='larry dignan' alt='larry dignan' width="65" height="70" border='0' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong>Larry Dignan (<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL">ZDNet</a>) submits: </strong><div><p>The New York Times (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt' title='New York Times Co.'>NYT</a>) on Thursday launched its long-awaited  digital subscription plan and access for all platforms—smartphones,  tablets and Web—can be pricey at $35 a month, but the model may just  work out.</p> <p>This digital subscription plan aims to thread a lot of needles. For  starters, the Times doesn’t want to nuke its Web traffic. As a result,  everyone gets 20 pieces of content before a subscription is needed.</p> <p>Once you hit that cap things can get complicated in a hurry (<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110317005924/en/York-Times-Launches-Digital-Subscriptions" rel="nofollow">statement</a>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/18/opinion/l18times.html" rel="nofollow">Times’ letter to readers</a>):</p> <ul><li>For Web access and the smartphone app it’s $15 a month, or $180 a year.</li><li>For Web access and a tablet app, it’s $20 a month, or $240 a year.</li><li>For access to all digital content—tablet, smartphone and Web—it’s $35 a month, or $420 a year.</li><li>And the Times is supporting in-app purchase on Apple’s App Store.</li></ul><p>As I noted in my <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004I6D07C" rel="nofollow">Kindle</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/258865-new-york-times-launches-digital-subscriptions-pros-and-cons?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt">NYT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/larry-dignan">Larry Dignan</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Content Is Still a Bad Business</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/258857-content-is-still-a-bad-business?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">258857</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>
  <div>
    <div>
      <div><p>It’s great  to see dying companies go back to the well with the idea that providing  marginally good content is a decent business model.  It only serves to  highlight innovative companies with new business models like Groupon and  all of its clones in the daily deal space.  They took the one good  business model content providers had, advertising, snatched it away from  them, and dramatically transformed it.</p> <p>The New York Times (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt' title='New York Times Co.'>NYT</a>) is getting ready to throw up yet another pay wall  on its site.  How many times have they failed at this before, yet they  go back to the well and give it another shot.  Note to the brass at the  NYT, it ain’t gonna work.  Why?  Because your content just isn’t good  enough, it’s just not specialized enough.  Why can the WSJ charge?  Why  can the FT charge?  Because their content is very specialized, and  although it’s not</p></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:36:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Leigh Drogen</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div>
  <div>
    <div>
      <div><p>It’s great  to see dying companies go back to the well with the idea that providing  marginally good content is a decent business model.  It only serves to  highlight innovative companies with new business models like Groupon and  all of its clones in the daily deal space.  They took the one good  business model content providers had, advertising, snatched it away from  them, and dramatically transformed it.</p> <p>The New York Times (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt' title='New York Times Co.'>NYT</a>) is getting ready to throw up yet another pay wall  on its site.  How many times have they failed at this before, yet they  go back to the well and give it another shot.  Note to the brass at the  NYT, it ain’t gonna work.  Why?  Because your content just isn’t good  enough, it’s just not specialized enough.  Why can the WSJ charge?  Why  can the FT charge?  Because their content is very specialized, and  although it’s not</p></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/258857-content-is-still-a-bad-business?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt">NYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wpo">WPO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mni">MNI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nws">NWS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aol">AOL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/leigh-drogen">Leigh Drogen</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

